Site seems to be OK. Load issue should be resolved now.

New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s): UPDATE: Rule published for comment on Fed Register

Sit back and talk with friends. Same rules as before. Rule #1-Relax with friends on the front or back porch.
Rule #2-No Politics, religion or anything above a G level.
Post Reply
User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s): UPDATE: Rule published for comment on Fed Register

Post by GunnyGene » Fri Sep 01, 2023 10:04 am

I've cleared this with Dave, with the proviso that y'all don't make this political. The links are provided for information only, and discussion of the facts as presented in the Proposed Rule. The rule is not available yet on Regulations.gov, but should be available for public comment within the next few days.

We've been waiting for this to drop. It has.
Posted on Whitehouse Briefing Room

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-roo ... ous-hands/

Ammoland article, which includes a copy of the ATF Proposed Rule (also can be downloaded as a pdf). The rule itself is 107 pages long and contains a great many details concerning the ability of non-FFL holders to conduct ( or offer for sale), private sales whether on-line or face to face. Watch out for that "presumed" word scattered around in the text of the Rule. It ain't your friend.

The basic objective is to implement, as much as legally possible, a National Universal Background Check system.

https://www.ammoland.com/2023/08/bidens ... z8C4ChH2Ub
Last edited by GunnyGene on Fri Sep 08, 2023 2:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
Mags
Administrator
Posts: 8769
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:40 pm
Location: Tualatin Valley Oregon
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by Mags » Fri Sep 01, 2023 1:55 pm

UPDATES: OR passes 114, "one of strictest gun control measures in U.S." https://henryrifleforums.com/viewtopic. ... 34#p213234

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by GunnyGene » Fri Sep 01, 2023 1:58 pm

Mags wrote:
Fri Sep 01, 2023 1:55 pm
Fixed Whitehouse link
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-roo ... ous-hands/
Thanks for WH fix. Sometimes copy/paste doesn't work. I'll edit the op. :)
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

John E Davies
Cattle Driver
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:48 pm
Location: Spokane WA
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by John E Davies » Fri Sep 01, 2023 2:08 pm

That shoe already dropped here, heavily, in Washington State a few months ago, and already a number of our smaller FFLs are shutting down because they cannot sell their inventories of “assault weapons”. For most FFLs that is about 75% of their inventory, for smaller specialized ones it is much closer to 100%. Most consumers are not looking for Henry’s… ;(

Did you know that your 10/22 with threaded barrel is an Evil Black Rifle? I can no longer sell mine unless I cut off the threads first. And the only way my daughter can get it is when I die. I am transitioning away from firearms into PCP airguns, but they too will be targets for insane laws in a few years, when legislators are done with firearms and find out some .50 cal PCPs have 800 ft pounds energy, and there are threaded barrels and cheap moderators for all of them.

John Davies
Spokane W#

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by GunnyGene » Fri Sep 01, 2023 2:33 pm

John E Davies wrote:
Fri Sep 01, 2023 2:08 pm
That shoe already dropped here, heavily, in Washington State a few months ago, and already a number of our smaller FFLs are shutting down because they cannot sell their inventories of “assault weapons”. For most FFLs that is about 75% of their inventory, for smaller specialized ones it is much closer to 100%. Most consumers are not looking for Henry’s… ;(

Did you know that your 10/22 with threaded barrel is an Evil Black Rifle? I can no longer sell mine unless I cut off the threads first. And the only way my daughter can get it is when I die. I am transitioning away from firearms into PCP airguns, but they too will be targets for insane laws in a few years, when legislators are done with firearms and find out some .50 cal PCPs have 800 ft pounds energy, and there are threaded barrels and cheap moderators for all of them.

John Davies
Spokane W#
The major difference with the new ATF proposed rule and State level rules like WA, is that it applies to all firearms (including imports and privately made), not just selected evil ones, and to all private sales (with only a couple minor exceptions). It's worth taking a half hour of your time to read it carefully before you send in a comment about it when it's posted on Regulations.gov. I'm keeping an eye on that and will post the link when available.
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
Vaquero
Ranch Boss
Posts: 12125
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:56 am
Location: Somewhere between Memphis & Nashville
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by Vaquero » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:14 am

John E Davies wrote:
Fri Sep 01, 2023 2:08 pm
That shoe already dropped here, heavily, in Washington State a few months ago, and already a number of our smaller FFLs are shutting down because they cannot sell their inventories of “assault weapons”. For most FFLs that is about 75% of their inventory, for smaller specialized ones it is much closer to 100%. Most consumers are not looking for Henry’s… ;(

Did you know that your 10/22 with threaded barrel is an Evil Black Rifle? I can no longer sell mine unless I cut off the threads first. And the only way my daughter can get it is when I die. I am transitioning away from firearms into PCP airguns, but they too will be targets for insane laws in a few years, when legislators are done with firearms and find out some .50 cal PCPs have 800 ft pounds energy, and there are threaded barrels and cheap moderators for all of them.

John Davies
Spokane W#
“assault weapons”. MY ASS
THEY ARE NOT ASSAULT WEAPONS.
They are merely semi-auto firearms. You can be assaulted with a lot of things. I hate when they are referred to as such.
Assault is an "action" and not an adjective.
You would think that the so-called educated people, would know better.

RP
Monte Walsh "You have No idea how little I care". :lol:

Ain't No Apologies for My Temperament :shock:
Si vis pacem, para bellum
H001, H006, H012

Luv the lever
Cowhand
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2022 9:52 pm
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by Luv the lever » Sat Sep 02, 2023 2:36 pm

This IS political. If we don’t address it we will all pay.

User avatar
daytime dave
Administrator / Owner
Posts: 5960
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: Upstate NY
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by daytime dave » Sat Sep 02, 2023 3:25 pm

Since we don't allow political discussion, I let Gene present this as informatin for everyone. I was unaware of it. Now I know.

Be informed all. I thank everyone for keeping political discussion out.
Some days I'm Andy, most days I'm Barney........
Eaglescout, NRA Life Endowment member, BCCI Life Member

User avatar
Hatchdog
Ranch Foreman
Posts: 7982
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2020 5:04 pm
Location: Deer Park, WA
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by Hatchdog » Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:03 am

As a resident of Washington State where many of the above laws are already in place I fear for the rest of the nation.

User avatar
Vaquero
Ranch Boss
Posts: 12125
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:56 am
Location: Somewhere between Memphis & Nashville
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by Vaquero » Sun Sep 03, 2023 12:43 pm

"The Biden administration has empowered the ATF to shut down gun stores for small clerical errors. President Joe Biden claims the new zero-tolerance policy only affects “rogue gun dealers,” but in practice, many more small gun stores are being targeted. FFL revocations are up between 350% and 500%, rising to a 17-year high. "

A Florida-based Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Industry Operations Inspector (IOI) seized a federal firearms licensee’s (FFL) completed ATF Form 4473s and bound book to take off-site to make copies violating federal law. The IOI would return the documents a week later. Last week, Kiloton Tactical joined a coalition of FFLs led by Eric Blandford of the Iraqveteran8888 YouTube channel and vowed to sue the ATF over the Biden Administration’s zero-tolerance policy for FFLs. The lawsuit has now been filed with the illegal actions of the IOI front and center in the complaint. According to 18 U.S.C. 923(g)(1)(A), FFLs must maintain records such as a bound book and copies of the ATF Form 4473, which Kiloton Tactical did maintain. During an inspection, an IOI is able to look over records for policy violations but does not have the authority to inspect the documents off-site. This action is expressly prohibited by 27 CFR § 478.23(cd). The statute reads: “The inspections and examinations provided by this section do not authorize an ATF officer to seize any records or documents other than those records or documents constituting material evidence of a violation of law. If an ATF officer seizes such records or documents, copies shall be provided to the licensee within a reasonable time.”...- John Crump

Read more: ATF Inspector Seizes Gun Store Customer Records Without A Warrant


RP
Monte Walsh "You have No idea how little I care". :lol:

Ain't No Apologies for My Temperament :shock:
Si vis pacem, para bellum
H001, H006, H012

User avatar
DsGrouse
Cowboy
Posts: 1553
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2021 8:07 am
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by DsGrouse » Sun Sep 03, 2023 3:59 pm

Not the same rule, but one that is of concern for us reloaders. I skipped forward past all the fluff to where he begins actually getting to the bloody point. I have no idea why they bury the lead all the fricken time.

https://youtu.be/anS4LBS5IcU?si=TqGJYwsim12dsQ6a&t=157

link to the rule.
https://www.regulations.gov/document/ATF-2023-0001-0001

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s)

Post by GunnyGene » Fri Sep 08, 2023 2:24 pm

The official Proposed Rule is now open for comment on the Federal Register. If you wish to comment, be sure you are commenting on the right document:
Comment on FR Doc # 2023-18075

https://www.regulations.gov/search?agen ... 2023-09-08

Be sure to read the many ways that ATF will presume you are in the business. Here's one, which indicates some collusion with the IRS:

(
2) spends more money or its equivalent on purchases of firearms for the purpose of resale than the person's reported taxable gross income during the applicable period of time; 
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
BigAl52
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 15048
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:43 pm
Location: Evans,Colorado
United States of America

Re: New rule about who needs an FFL to sell gun(s): UPDATE: Rule published for comment on Fed Register

Post by BigAl52 » Fri Sep 08, 2023 3:24 pm

The end result here is to eventually take everything away. They will find a way to do it by combining laws with other laws. There is only one way it isnt going to happen and I dont see that taking place
Don't let the old man in


H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55

Post Reply