Dang!RanchRoper wrote:Yup. We're a long time dead. Go for it.
Cate
Dang!RanchRoper wrote:Yup. We're a long time dead. Go for it.
Mags wrote:.
So from your experience should I delist the Stallion from my wish list?
PT7 wrote:Been following this thread regularly, and find the chat most interesting....especially learning more about the Japanese rifles. Also enjoyed the "Hobbit" analogy...can just see the wood cart poking along around the Shire!
The only comment I can make is about the Uberti screws. I have found the Uberti S/A revolvers are currently still produced with those pesky soft-headed screws. Would make me think the same quality level goes into their rifles.
I have no replica rifles, but on two of the three Uberti revolvers I have, I've chinked up side screws on two of them. I ordered a replacement trigger screw for my .357 Police, but uncertain about replacing it until I learn what happens to the trigger when this screw is pulled. Just don't want to "screw" it up, so plan to check with a gunsmith first....they do still use soft headed screws which can at times be very problematic to get out and their internals are not as refined as those guns made by Miroku...
Similarly, really created a sharp edge on a Stallion screw. But it unscrews easily, and I should just file it down.
No screw issues with my Russian .45 Colt. Screws remain tight, and think it's built like a tank.
Still awaiting the end result of the "weakening." I really cannot guess what the final rifle choice will be.
Suspense, suspense!![]()
PT7
Great move! Take what you've got and figure out how to make it better! Sometimes this can be better than starting all over with something brand new.Mistered wrote:Well, now the 'weakness' has passed I am moving on and studying sight options for my 1899 M-94!
Yep - mostly this was a 'flash in the pan' - a 'leftover' thought from a few years ago.Sometimes this can be better than starting all over with something brand new.