Page 1 of 1

Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 7:13 am
by 1895Gunner
I just uploaded my review of this new rifle and bottom line, I'm very happy with it. The review is located https://1895gunner.com/bulletpoints/bul ... ts-42.html if allowed.

Image

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 9:12 am
by GFK
Nice looking firearm! Thanks for the review! I liked how you highlighted its niche.

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 10:02 am
by daytime dave
Thank you for sharing your excellent review of this new rifle and cartridge. I hope it serves you well this fall.
I agree, it is a very handsome rifle!

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:07 am
by Hatchdog
I’ll read your review later when I have more time but I just wanted to chime in on what a great looking rifle you have.

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:21 am
by BigAl52
The rifle looks great. I read thru your review. In no way am I being critical of your review. But I just wonder why people snub the 38-55 and why the need for this caliber in the first place as 38-55 is quite capable of taking any deer or elk for that matter in North America.

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:50 am
by Vaquero
BigAl52 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:21 am
The rifle looks great. I read thru your review. In no way am I being critical of your review. But I just wonder why people snub the 38-55 and why the need for this caliber in the first place as 38-55 is quite capable of taking any deer or elk for that matter in North America.
Al, it was designed for those stupid states and don't allow regular rifle calibers for deer hunting.
Then came up with the idea of a short straight wall case. No longer than 1.8" :roll:
Which is completely Stupid, this cartridge is suppose to be 200 fps faster than the 35 Rem., with the same bullet.
So how is it safer? :roll:
Just more governmental BS.

RP

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:58 am
by BigAl52
Vaquero wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:50 am
BigAl52 wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:21 am
The rifle looks great. I read thru your review. In no way am I being critical of your review. But I just wonder why people snub the 38-55 and why the need for this caliber in the first place as 38-55 is quite capable of taking any deer or elk for that matter in North America.
Al, it was designed for those stupid states and don't allow regular rifle calibers for deer hunting.
Then came up with the idea of a short straight wall case. No longer than 1.8" :roll:
Which is completely Stupid, this cartridge is suppose to be 200 fps faster than the 35 Rem., with the same bullet.
So how is it safer? :roll:
Just more governmental BS.

RP
Guess I didnt know there was a case limit also. But he still mentions 30-30 and 35 Remington. no mention of the above caliber in 38-55. Its another case to me anyway of Rodney Dangerfield. 41 mag and 38-55. cant get no respect

Re: Review of the Henry H009G-360BH Buckhammer

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:17 am
by Hatchdog
Hatchdog wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 11:07 am
I’ll read your review later when I have more time but I just wanted to chime in on what a great looking rifle you have.
Read your review this morning and thanks for doing it. I have to say whoever named the cartridge did well. Buckhammer is exactly what it should do.