All targets at 55 yards.
Here is my go-to load,
180-grain Hornaday JTC-SIL with 5.8grains of Win 244 (this is a GRT-specific modeled load base on my Henry's chamber,) COAL 1.575.
This is a 10 shot group. I cleared the two cold bore shots from the chrono data.
Here is the first grouping with the swaged bullets that ranged from 170-to 179 grains. I had 11 bullets that I made in four sessions, the I tried different things during each session. So, with that caveat, none of these were very consistent. This is 11 shots at 55 yards. 5.8 grains seated at 1.575 coal
Next up, the 11-shot 55-yard group from the 190-ish grain swaged bullets. Again, these 11 bullets were made in four batches. The weights ranged from 189 to 198 grains. You can see there are some stability issues. I fired three shots at the left diamond, but I did not realize two of the bullets went into the same hole. I relocated my point of aim to the bottom of the solid red line. Four of the 190-grain bullets seem to be on the edge of being unstable. Now, is that the load, bullet point shape, or is it something else? I don't know. 5.8 grains 1.585 coal
This is the final group of swaged bullets; there are nine in total. Four weighed 208 grains, and three weighed 220 grains. They were fired at 55 yards. 5.8 grains seated 1.595 coal. The stability issues are more prevalent. I am unsure if this is due to the bullet's overall length or to the inconsistencies in the bullets I swaged.
Now, that little experiment seemed to prove the concept of swaged bullets. For all the given weights, there are places where I think I can narrow this down and have some pretty good bullets.
I'm specifically interested in the 170—and 180-grain range. When I get some actual dies, I'll start by replicating bullets in those weights.
Now that the barrel was warm, I put on my suppressor and fired 15 rounds of my 180-grain Hornady JTC-SIL bullets. Here is that group.
