Page 1 of 1

It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2023 5:48 pm
by GunnyGene
A true event, and a game.

The Event:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a33gj/ ... lated-test


The game:

The Paperclip Maximizer:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/7xwb8z/ ... pth-desire

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2023 7:41 pm
by Cofisher
We meatbags have historically mucked up just about any imagined effort. Not sure I trust any machine designed by us to make life and death decisions. Go Skynet! Lol

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:03 pm
by dave77
Anything that has AI should have Asimov's 3 laws of robotics built in.

Terminators and The Matrix are not that far-feched anymore. Who knows, maybe it's already happening.🙀

Issac Asimov's three laws of robotics
"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:27 pm
by GunnyGene
dave77 wrote: ↑
Thu Jun 01, 2023 8:03 pm
Anything that has AI should have Asimov's 3 laws of robotics built in.

Terminators and The Matrix are not that far-feched anymore. Who knows, maybe it's already happening.🙀

Issac Asimov's three laws of robotics
"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."
Some additional reading about those fictional laws:

https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/isaa ... are-wrong/

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:29 pm
by Freedom
As a side note Elon Musk's company Neuralink has won US approval for human trials of a brain implant that would allow direct human interface with AI.
I can see the possible benefits but there is definitely the potential for misuse in the long run.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-65717487

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49004004

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2023 2:47 pm
by GunnyGene
Freedom wrote: ↑
Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:29 pm
As a side note Elon Musk's company Neuralink has won US approval for human trials of a brain implant that would allow direct human interface with AI.
I can see the possible benefits but there is definitely the potential for misuse in the long run.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-65717487

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49004004
I think I'll pass.

Image

Re: It wouldn't take NO for an answer

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2023 8:56 am
by Hatchdog
Freedom wrote: ↑
Sun Jun 04, 2023 12:29 pm
As a side note Elon Musk's company Neuralink has won US approval for human trials of a brain implant that would allow direct human interface with AI.
I can see the possible benefits but there is definitely the potential for misuse in the long run.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-65717487

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49004004
Anytime there is a “potential for misuse” misuse will happen. Period. Scary times ahead.