Al, yeah, the 617 has had plenty of issues of late. Mine had to go back twice. After inspection, the guys at the shop and I caught the first problem before I took it home, but the second problem was light strikes and that's not something you can catch with an inspection. Had to take it home and test fire it before the problem showed up. Very annoying, because my previous 617 from 8 years back had the same problem and also had to go back to Smith. It's a chronic problem with 617s. S&W, though, has always taken care of issues when need be, but they are slow. Ruger turn around time is much better.
And for you vintage S&W folks, let me also add that I have had two vintage S&W Model 17 22 LRs that had extraction problems due to rough chambers. Old doesn't automatically mean better.
Meanwhile, my Uberti Cattleman 12 shot 22 LR sits and waits for me to send it in for repair for light strikes. Just too busy to get it packed up, but will get to it. Besides, I have plenty of other 22 revolvers to shoot.
So what 22 LR revolver over my lifetime of collecting and shooting has had the best track record for reliability? It ain't even close on this one. Ruger Single Sixes. Not Single Tens or Single Sevens, mind you. Have had issues with those. Has to be the old 6 shooter Single Sixes. I lost count years ago, but I've probably had two dozen Single Sixes Single Sixes, Old Model or New Model in all kinds of configurations and not a one has had to go back to Ruger. The Single Six usually won't beat a Smith for accuracy, but still accurate enough. Back in the day, I used Single Sixes more than any other 22 handgun for small game hunting. And I guarantee, you cannot wear out a Single Six.
Just picked up another Old Model Single Six this week and, yup, shoots fine. Good firing pin strikes and easy extraction. This one is an Old Model Standard (fixed sights) SS made in 1969. Yeah, Old Model Ruger single actions are my weak spot. Hard for me to walk away from one.
